Category Archives: green card

USCIS Policy Alert: Approval of Form I-485, Adjustment (Green Card) Applications is Now an “Extraordinary” Relief

Form I-485, Adjustment of Status is for eligible applicants who are already in the United States and are seeking to obtain a green card. USCIS Policy Memorandum PM-602-0199, issued on May 21, 2026, instructs USCIS officers to consider adjustment of status an “extraordinary” relief. This means USCIS may deny adjustment applications, as a matter of discretion, if it determines the applicant must instead apply for an Immigrant Visa at the U.S. Embassy/Consulate abroad.

The policy does not change the eligibility requirements to obtain a green card through the Form I-485 application process. Rather, it emphasizes that adjustment to permanent residence within the United States is a discretionary benefit, instead of an entitlement or normal path to receiving a green card.

USCIS officers must now carefully consider whether a Form I-485 applicant deserves approval, based on the totality of circumstances and the best interest of the United States. Under prior policy, USCIS would normally issue an Approval Notice if the applicant met the statutory eligibility requirements under INA 245(a) and had no inadmissibility bars.

The Policy Memo directs USCIS officers to apply higher discretionary scrutiny in weighing the positive versus the negative factors. Unless Form I-485 applicants have unusual or outstanding equities (extraordinary circumstances), USCIS may not permit them to bypass the Immigrant Visa application process.

The Policy Memo states that with limited exceptions, the statutory scheme suggests that Congress expects paroled and nonimmigrant applicants to depart for Immigrant Visa processing, rather than apply for adjustment of status. It adds that a “contravention of this expectation and attempt to avoid the ordinary consular immigrant visa process, usually accompanied by their violation of our immigration laws, are adverse factors,” which the applicant “may need ‘to offset…by a showing of unusual or even outstanding equities.'”

Positive Factors that USCIS Will Consider

In deciding whether to approve the Form I-485 application, on discretionary grounds, USCIS will consider positive factors, such as:

  • Family ties, such as marriage to a U.S. citizen or permanent resident.
  • Hardship to the applicant or close relatives if the adjustment application is denied.
  • Long lawful residence in the U.S. in valid nonimmigrant status, such as H-1B, L-1, O-1, E-2 and TN.
  • Compliance with U.S. immigration laws and conditions of the U.S. nonimmigrant status held.
  • Property, investment, or business ties in the United States.
  • Long and stable authorized employment in the United States.
  • Education, skills or training obtained at a U.S. educational institution, which is relevant to the applicant’s current or prospective employment.
  • Lack of a criminal record.
  • Compliance with tax laws.
  • Voluntary community service and contributions to society.

New applicants or applicants with pending cases should prepare to show favorable factors to warrant an approval, under the totality of the circumstances. They may proactively submit the information to USCIS or in response to a Request for Evidence or Notice of Intent to Deny from USCIS.

Negative Factors that USCIS Will Consider

In determining whether to deny the application, as a matter of discretion, USCIS will consider negative factors, such as:

  • Absence of close family, community and residence ties in the United States.
  • Failure to maintain lawful status or to comply with the terms of the status, such as overstaying the authorized period.
  • Engaging in conduct that conflicts with the purpose of the temporary admission, parole, or nonimmigrant status, like switching quickly to another status following arrival in the U.S. as an F-1 student or a B1/B2 visitor.
  • Fraud or false testimony in dealings with USCIS or any other government agency.
  • Unauthorized employment in the United States.
  • Criminal history, especially when it involves serious crimes, multiple offenses, or recent violations.
  • Failure to pay taxes owed or child support.

Although the shift in policy will affect a wide range of applicants, it is likely to have LESS of an impact on:

  • H-1B and L-1 nonimmigrants who are allowed to have dual intent and do not have to overcome the presumption of immigrant intent under INA 214(b).
  • O-1, TN, E-2, and E-3 visa holders who are maintaining continuous lawful status through authorized employment in the U.S.
  • Immediate relatives of a U.S. citizen because they have statutory exemptions for certain status violations, such as failing to maintain lawful status or overstaying the authorized period. (An Immediate Relative is a U.S. citizen’s spouse; a U.S. citizen’s unmarried child under 21; or a U.S. citizen’s parent – if the citizen is age 21 or older).
  • Refugees and asylees.
  • VAWA-based applicants.
  • Special Immigrant Juveniles (SIJs).

Options if USCIS Denies Your Form I-485 Application

When USCIS denies a benefit request, it must issue a written denial notice explaining the specific reasons for the decision. If the denial is based on an unfavorable exercise of discretion, the denial notice must describe the positive and negative factors considered, along with an explanation of why the negative factors outweigh the positive factors.

If USCIS denies your Form I-485 application as a matter of discretion, but you otherwise meet the eligibility requirements to obtain a green card, you have four main options:

Submit a Motion to Reconsider or Reopen to USCIS, Administrative Appeals Office. This involves timely filing the Form I-290B, Notice of Appeal or Motion with the appropriate USCIS office, explaining how USCIS made the wrong decision or requesting USCIS consider new and relevant evidence that was unavailable in the prior application.

File a new Form I-485 Application with USCIS. This must include new, material information and documents demonstrating extraordinary circumstances to obtain the extraordinary relief of adjustment of status.

Apply for an Immigrant Visa through consular processing. This requires you to depart the United States, submit the Form DS-260 Immigrant Visa application and other required documents to the U.S. Department of State, and attend a scheduled visa interview at the U.S. Embassy/Consulate. You will also need to obtain a Form I-601 or I-601A waiver if you are subject to being found inadmissible due to accrual of unlawful presence (prior to departure from the United States).

Remain in the U.S. without lawful status (if you have no other valid status). This will subject you to removal proceedings before the Immigration Court through a Notice to Appear (Form I-862) issued by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security. You may present the Form I-485 application as a defense to removal, assuming you are statutorily eligible for such relief, but USCIS has denied it only as a matter of discretion.

In some cases, pursuing Form I-485 adjustment in removal proceedings may be less risky than consular processing, where you could be stuck abroad due to the unlawful presence bar or administrative delays or U.S. travel bans preventing Immigrant Visa grants.

Whether this USCIS Memo will stand up against federal court litigation or application of laws passed by Congress is uncertain. There could be more guidelines instructing USCIS officers on how to apply the policy on a case-by-case basis and to different categories of applicants.

In any event, eligible Form I-485 applicants are not forbidden from applying for adjustment when U.S. immigration law does not prohibit them from doing so.

Consult an experienced U.S. immigration attorney to help you (1) assess your eligibility for Form I-485, adjustment of status, (2) demonstrate the positive factors to warrant a favorable exercise of discretion, and (3) supplement your pending Form I-485 application or strengthen a new application.

For more information on the Form I-485 adjustment process, see:

Who is Eligible (and Not Eligible) for Adjustment to Permanent Resident Status?

Adjusting to Permanent Resident Status Under INA 245(a): Bars, Exceptions and Exemptions

A Key Requirement for I-485 Adjustment to Permanent Resident Status: Inspection and Admission OR Inspection and Parole

The current USCIS Policy Manual – shown below – may be updated after the release of the Policy Memo titled, Adjustment of Status is a Matter of Discretion and Administrative Grace, and an Extraordinary Relief that Permits Applicants to Dispense with the Ordinary
Consular Visa Process
.

# # #

This article provides general information only. It is based on law, regulations and policy that are subject to change. Do not consider it as legal advice for any individual case or situation. Each legal case is different and case examples do not constitute a prediction or guarantee of success or failure in any other case. The sharing or receipt of this information does not create an attorney-client relationship.

SUBSCRIBE           CONTACT

Immigrant Visa Suspension for 75 Countries: Public Charge Concerns Cited as the Reason

On January 14, the Trump Administration announced the suspension of Immigrant Visa processing for citizens of 75 countries.  The list includes:

Afghanistan, Albania, Algeria, Antigua and Barbuda, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bahamas, Bangladesh, Barbados, Belarus, Belize, Bhutan, Bosnia, Brazil, Burma, Cambodia, Cameroon, Cape Verde, Colombia, Congo, Cuba, Dominica, Egypt, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Fiji, Gambia, Georgia, Ghana, Grenada, Guatemala, Guinea, Haiti, Iran, Iraq, Ivory Coast, Jamaica, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kosovo, Kuwait, Kyrgyzstan, Laos, Lebanon, Liberia, Libya, Macedonia, Moldova, Mongolia, Montenegro, Morocco, Nepal, Nicaragua, Nigeria, Pakistan, Republic of the Congo, Russia, Rwanda, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Senegal, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Sudan, Sudan, Syria, Tanzania, Thailand, Togo, Tunisia, Uganda, Uruguay, Uzbekistan and Yemen.

This U.S. immigration policy takes effect on January 21. This is an indefinite pause with no set date for when it will end.

“The Trump administration is bringing an end to the abuse of America’s immigration system by those who would extract wealth from the American people,” the U.S. Department of State said. “Immigrant visa processing from these 75 countries will be paused while the State Department reassess immigration processing procedures to prevent the entry of foreign nationals who would take welfare and public benefits.”

What are the Exceptions?

There is an exception for dual nationals who apply with a valid passport from a country not included in the suspension.

In addition, the suspension does not restrict applicants seeking non-immigrant visas, such as B1/B2 temporary tourist or business visas, who make up the larger percentage of visa applicants. Demand for non-immigrant visas is expected to rise for the 2026 World Cup and 2028 Olympics, which the U.S. will host or co-host.

What are the Effects on U.S. Immigration?

U.S. Consulates will not issue Immigrant Visas to applicants who are from any of the 75 countries, even if they are otherwise eligible for the visa. Although they may submit their forms and documents to the DOS, their applications will not be granted while the suspension is in effect.

During the pause, the legal paths to U.S. immigration and permanent residence will be tightened. After the suspension is lifted, applicants will still have to meet long-existing eligibility requirements.

How Does This Policy Support the Trump Administration’s U.S. Immigration Stance? 

The Trump Administration has already restricted immigrant and non-immigrant visa processing for citizens of dozens of countries, many of them in Africa, Asia and Latin America. In June 2025, it imposed U.S. travel restrictions on citizens from 12 countries: Afghanistan, Chad, Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Myanmar, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen.

The suspension is based on a November guidance directed to U.S. Embassy and Consulate officials to comprehensively and thoroughly vet visa applicants to demonstrate that they will not need to rely on public benefits from the U.S. government any time after they are admitted to the United States.

What U.S. Immigration Law Creates Public Charge Requirements?

Section 212(a)(4) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) prohibits applicants from receiving an immigrant visa or adjusting to permanent residence if they are likely, at any time, to become a public charge. To show they are not inadmissible on this ground, a Form I-864, Affidavit of Support, filed on their behalf is required in most family-based and some employment-based immigrant visa or adjustment cases.

In his first term, Trump and his Administration introduced a new Final Rule on August 14, 2019, which amended how U.S. immigration agencies applied section 212(a)(4). The 2019 Rule gave USCIS more discretionary power to deny Form I-485 green card requests and Form I-129 and Form I-539 applications to change status or extend status, on the public charge ground. The rule was set to take effect on October 15, 2019, i.e. 60 days after its publication. But federal court litigation delayed the implementation of the rule to February 24, 2020.

Then on March 9, 2021, the Public Charge rule under the prior Trump Administration was vacated and removed. USCIS and the U.S. Department of State returned to the old 1999 rule to determine whether a person is likely to become a public charge on the U.S. government.

The August 8, 2024 (08-28-2024) update in the DOS’ Foreign Affairs Manual instructs officers to consider the “Totality of Circumstances” to determine whether the applicant is likely to become a public charge. They are to consider, at a minimum, the applicant’s:

(a) Age;

(b) Health;

(c) Family status;

(d) Assets, resources, and financial status; and;

(e)  Education or skills.

A properly filed, non-fraudulent Form I-864 in cases where it is required, is normally enough to meet the INA 212(a)(4) requirements and satisfy the “totality of the circumstances” test. But the factors cited above could be relevant in usual cases in which a Form I-864 has been submitted and should also be considered in cases where a Form I-864 is not required.

The public charge rule is forward looking, so officers are instructed to focus on the applicant’s present circumstances at the time of the visa application.  A visa may not be refused based on speculation about financial issues that may occur in the future, such as a loss of job or medical emergency.

Past or current receipt of cash benefits for income maintenance by a family member of the visa applicant may be factored in only when such benefits also constitute(d) the primary means of subsistence of the applicant.

It’s not clear whether or how exactly the State Department will modify instructions relating to INA 212(a)(4) inadmissibility.

For more information, see:

Form I-864: Key to Meeting the Financial Requirements for Permanent Residence and Avoiding a Public Charge Determination

Form I-864: Alternatives to Meeting the Financial Requirement for Permanent Residence and Avoiding a Public Charge Determination

2019 Public Charge Rule Gets Tossed; 1999 Rule is Back

Immigrant Visa Process: Delays and Setbacks

# # #

The Legal Immigrant provides general information and is for educational purposes only. It is based on U.S. immigration law, regulations and policy that are subject to change. Do not consider it as legal advice for your situation. The sharing or receipt of this information does not create an attorney-client relationship.

SUBSCRIBE           CONTACT

Rescission of INA 204(c) Charge + Removal of INA 212(a)(6)(C)(i) Bar in K-1 Visa Case= A True Success Story

USCIS approved the Form I-129F, K-1 fiancé petition of our U.S. citizen client, after issuing a Notice of Intent to Deny it under INA 204(c). In the NOID, USCIS claimed her foreign national fiancé entered a prior sham marriage to a Form I-485 green card applicant solely to gain permanent residence as a derivative beneficiary.

After receiving our Response to the NOID, USCIS vacated the 204(c) charge and approved the petition. Still, the U.S. Consulate refused the K-1 visa under INA 212(a)(6)(C)(i) and instructed the applicant to file for an I-601 waiver. Ten days after receiving our Motion to Reconsider the Inadmissibility Finding, the U.S. Consulate rescinded the (6)(C) refusal and then granted the visa.

USCIS Charges Beneficiary with INA 204(c)/Marriage Fraud Bar in Form I-129F Petition

Section 204(c) of the Immigration & Nationality Act prohibits USCIS from approving a visa petition (e.g. Form I-129F or I-130) if the beneficiary entered or conspired to enter a marriage for the purpose of evading U.S. immigration laws. If there is substantial and probative evidence of such an attempt or conspiracy in the beneficiary’s file – regardless of whether the benefit was received – USCIS will deny the petition under 204(c).

In its Notice of Intent to Deny the Form I-129F petition, USCIS claimed it was apparent the beneficiary entered a prior sham marriage to a Form I-485 green card applicant for the sole purpose of circumventing U.S. immigration laws. It determined that it was prohibited from approving the petition under 204(c).

The NOID marked the first opportunity to respond to the allegations of a prior sham marriage. In its earlier Request for Evidence (RFE), USCIS had asked only for proof of a real relationship and engagement between the couple. There was no mention of the 204(c) bar. The petitioner responded to the RFE on her own and then USCIS took several months to issue the NOID on section 204(c) grounds.

USCIS Vacates INA 204(c) Charge and Approves Form I-129F Petition Based on NOID Response

The petitioner and beneficiary contacted Dyan Williams Law for representation in addressing the NOID. Within 30 days, I filed a timely and persuasive Response to the NOID, which contained credible testimonies, objective evidence and legal argument establishing the beneficiary and his prior spouse entered a good-faith marriage, but it ended due to unresolved differences.

Eight months later, USCIS issued a Form I-797, Approval Notice for the I-129F petition. They agreed there was no substantial and probative evidence to sustain the 204(c) finding. The parties then consulted with Dyan Williams Law to complete the K-1 visa application at the U.S. Consulate.

U.S. Consulate Issues K-1 Visa Refusal Notice under INA 212(a)(6)(C)(i)

Because the 204(c) charge was vacated, we expected the visa interview to go well. But at the end of the interview, the U.S. Consulate issued a K-1 visa refusal notice citing to “6C1.” The consular officer merely stated it was based on the prior marriage, even though USCIS had already resolved this issue in the applicant’s favor.

To find that an applicant is inadmissible or ineligible for a visa under INA 212(a)(6)(C)(i), the consular officer must find all the following elements are met:

  • The applicant made a false representation;
  • The false representation was willfully made;
  • The fact misrepresented is material;
  • The false representation was made to a U.S. government official, such as a consular officer; and
  • The applicant, by using fraud or misrepresentation, seeks to procure, sought to procure, or procured, a benefit under U.S. immigration laws, such as a visa or admission to the United States.

U.S. Consulate Rescinds INA 212(a)(6)(C)(i) Inadmissibility Finding and Grants K-1 Fiancé Visa Based on Motion to Reconsider

The petitioner and beneficiary contacted Dyan Williams Law for representation in overcoming the (6)(C)(i) inadmissibility finding. We discussed the option of filing a Form I-601 waiver of inadmissibility with USCIS. This would involve a long processing time and the high evidentiary burden of proving the petitioner would face “extreme hardship” if the beneficiary was denied admission to the United States.

Ultimately, with counsel’s recommendation, they pursued another option: a Motion to Reconsider and Rescind the 212(a)(6)(C)(i) Inadmissibility Finding with the U.S. Consulate.

We took several months to gather the necessary documentary evidence and written testimonies, including a declaration from the prior spouse confirming her marriage to the beneficiary was bona fide. In the legal argument, I also pointed out the applicant had never used fraud or willful misrepresentation of material facts in any request for U.S. immigration benefits. I also noted the (6)(C)(i) finding conflicted with USCIS’ approval of the Form I-129F petition, after it dropped the 204(c) charge.

USCIS’ approval of the petition did not necessarily mean the elements of fraud or willful misrepresentation were not met, but only that it lacked substantial and probative evidence of a prior sham marriage. Thankfully, it did not take long for the U.S. Consulate to make a positive decision.

Ten days after receiving the Motion to Reconsider, the U.S. Consulate sent an email notice stating it removed the (6)(C)(i) bar and provided further instructions for the K-1 visa process. The applicant completed the next steps and, three months later, received the visa for lawful admission to the U.S. in K-1 status.

USCIS Approves Form I-485 Application for Permanent Residence

Within 90 days of the K-1 visa holder’s arrival in the United States, he and his U.S. citizen fiancée married and began their life together. They then contacted Dyan Williams Law to represent them in the Form I-485 green card application.

Less than three months after USCIS received the Form I-485 application, they appeared for their scheduled Adjustment of Status interview before USCIS. The application was readily approved on the spot, with no doubts from USCIS regarding the beneficiary’s prior marriage or his existing marriage to the petitioner. The USCIS officer said they had great documentary evidence for an approval and did not ask about the NOID, the (6)(C)(i) visa refusal notice, or their relationship.

USCIS granted a two-year conditional green card because the marriage was less than two years old at the time it approved the Form I-485 application. The beneficiary will need to file a Form I-751 petition to remove the condition on his residence and to keep his U.S. immigration status. He may also file for naturalization (U.S. citizenship) when he meets the continuous residence requirement and other eligibility criteria.

It took 6 years for the applicant to receive his permanent residence from the time the Form I-129F petition was filed with USCIS. This long and complicated U.S. immigration journey is a true success story for the clients and Dyan Williams Law.

# # #
The Legal Immigrant provides general information only from Dyan Williams Law. It is based on U.S. immigration laws, regulations and policies that are subject to change. Do not consider it as legal advice. The sharing or receipt of this information does not create an attorney-client relationship.

SUBSCRIBE           CONTACT

USCIS Drops COVID-19 Vaccination Requirement for Green Card (Form I-485, Adjustment of Status) Applicants

As of January 22, 2025, USCIS is waiving any and all COVID-19 vaccination requirements for eligible applicants seeking adjustment to permanent residence within the United States. Therefore, Form I-485 (green card) applicants are no longer required to present documentation on their Form I-693, Report of Immigration Medical Examination and Vaccination Record, that they received the COVID-19 vaccination.

The USCIS notice states, “USCIS will not issue any Request for Evidence or Notice of Intent to Deny related to proving a COVID-19 vaccination. USCIS will not deny any adjustment of status application based on the applicant’s failure to present documentation that they received the COVID-19 vaccination.”

Under the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) section 212(a)(1)(A)(ii), green card and Immigrant Visa applicants are inadmissible and ineligible for permanent residence if they fail to show proof that they were vaccinated against communicable diseases of public health significance, which are vaccine-preventable. The list has long included:

  • Mumps
  • Measles;
  • Rubella;
  • Polio;
  • Tetanus and Diphtheria Toxoids;
  • Pertussis;
  • Haemophilus influenzae type B;
  • Hepatitis B

USCIS adds that it considers other vaccine-preventable diseases recommended by the Advisory Committee for Immunization Practices (ACIP).The ACIP is an advisory committee to the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) that recommends immunizations for the general U.S. population.

Since December 2009, CDC has assessed whether vaccines recommended for the general U.S. population should be required for immigration purposes on a regular and on an as-needed basis according to specific criteria set by CDC.

CDC is responsible for publishing the Technical Instructions for Civil Surgeons who conduct immigration medical examinations. Along with the HHS regulations, they instruct civil surgeons on how to conduct the vaccination assessment. The civil surgeon records the results of the immigration medical examination, including vaccination assessment, on USCIS’ Form I-693, which is included with the Form I-485 application for permanent residence.

In October 2021, the former Biden Administration implemented the COVID-19 vaccination requirement for green card and Immigrant Visa applicants based on CDC’s finding that COVID-19 was vaccine-preventable. In its October 2023 article, titled, 5 Things You Should Know about COVID-19 Vaccines, the CDC stated, “We have multiple years of experience showing the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines. However, the strains of virus causing most of the disease change and immunity wanes over time. The changes from last year’s vaccines are small, but they help make the vaccine better at targeting the virus strains circulating now and give your immune system a boost.”

The CDC added, “When considering vaccine effectiveness studies, it is critical to evaluate the totality of evidence across many studies which shows that:

  • COVID-19 vaccines provide sustained protection against severe disease and death, the purpose of the vaccine.
  • The protection against infection tends to be modest and sometimes short-lived, but the vaccines are very effective at protecting against severe illness.

Despite the sharp drop in COVID-19 vaccinations across the U.S. population over the years, green card and Immigrant Visa applicants had to file for a religious or moral exemption if they refused to take the COVID-19 vaccine and had no medical contraindications. Such an exemption is challenging to get when it relates to a specific vaccine, and not vaccination in general. Although vaccination requirements continue to apply, USCIS no longer requires the COVID-19 vaccine under the Trump Administration.

The U.S. Department of State is responsible for processing Immigrant Visa applications at the U.S. Consulates and U.S. Embassies abroad. As of today, January 28, 2025, the DOS’ website continues to state:

“Panel physicians who conduct medical examinations of immigrant visa applicants are required to verify that immigrant visa applicants have met the vaccination requirements, or that it is medically inappropriate for the visa applicant to receive one or more of the listed vaccinations:

  • COVID-19
  • Hepatitis A
  • Hepatitis B
  • Influenza
  • Influenza type b (Hib)
  • Measles
  • Meningococcal
  • Mumps
  • Pneumococcal
  • Pertussis
  • Polio
  • Rotavirus
  • Rubella
  • Tetanus and diphtheria toxoids
  • Varicella

In order to assist the panel physician, and to avoid delays in the processing of an immigrant visa, all immigrant visa applicants should have their vaccination records available for the panel physician’s review at the time of the immigrant medical examination.”

Because USCIS has dropped the COVID-19 vaccination requirement for green card applicants, it is expected that the DOS will do the same for Immigrant Visa applicants.

# # #
The Legal Immigrant provides general information only from Dyan Williams Law. It is based on U.S. immigration laws, regulations and policies that are subject to changeDo not consider it as legal advice. The sharing or receipt of this information does not create an attorney-client relationship.

SUBSCRIBE           CONTACT


USCIS Implements Form I-131F, Application for Parole in Place for Certain Undocumented Spouses and Stepchildren of U.S. Citizens

On August 19, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) implemented the Form I-131F, Application for Parole in Place for Certain Noncitizen Spouses and Stepchildren of U.S. Citizens. This allows certain spouses and stepchildren of U.S. citizens – who did not enter the U.S. lawfully – to apply for permanent residence within the U.S., instead of needing to depart for Immigrant Visa processing.

USCIS is now accepting Form I-131F applications for Parole in Place. Although it’s a path to permanent residence through Form I-485 adjustment, it does not automatically lead to it. The future of this program is also uncertain because it was introduced by federal rule under the Biden Administration, not by Act of Congress, and is subject to legal challenges in federal courts.

The eligibility criteria, application process, and examples of required evidence are published in the Federal Register notice, dated August 20, 2024.  More information is in USCIS’ Filing Gude for Form I-131F, and USCIS’ Frequently Asked Questions About Keeping Families Together.

Who Benefits from the Parole in Place Program?

The Parole in Place program is intended to benefit certain green card applicants who:

  • are physically present in the U.S. without inspection and admission or parole;
  • are legally married to a U.S. citizen OR are legally the stepchildren of a U.S. citizen, as of June 17, 2024;
  • have been continuously present in the U.S. for 10 years or more, as of June 17, 2024;
  • do not pose a threat to public safety or national security;
  • are otherwise eligible to apply for adjustment of status; and
  • merit a favorable exercise of discretion.

For U.S. immigration purposes, a “child” is an unmarried person under the age of 21. If the person is a “stepchild”, the marriage between the U.S. citizen and the biological parent must have occurred before the stepchild turned 18.]

Spouses and stepchildren of U.S. citizens who are not physically present in the U.S. as of June 17, 2024, have not been continuously present in the U.S. since June 17, 2014 or earlier, have a serious criminal record that poses a risk of harm to the public or nation, or have negative factors that make them ineligible for or undeserving of adjustment of status will not benefit from this program.

How Does the Parole in Place (Form I-131F) Application Expand Who May Apply for Adjustment to Permanent Residence?

Statutory law under INA 245(a) (8 U.S.C. §1255) allows a nonimmigrant (e.g. F-1 student or H-1B temporary worker) to adjust to permanent residence based on an approved immigrant petition. This involves filing the Form I-485, Application to Register Permanent Residence or Adjust Status, with USCIS, either concurrently with or after the Form I-130 or Form I-140 filing.

An approved or approvable Form I-130 (family-based) or Form I-140 (employment-based) petition does not necessarily mean you qualify for adjustment of status. There are several eligibility requirements to meet for INA 245(a) adjustment.

Except for INA 245(i) and VAWA-based applicants, one key requirement is that you must have been “inspected and admitted or paroled” into the United States. This applies to even “Immediate Relatives” of a U.S. citizen; namely, spouses, unmarried children under 21 years old, and parents (if the U.S. citizen is 21 years of age or older).

Without lawful admission or parole into the U.S., they must leave the U.S. to apply for an Immigrant Visa at a U.S. Embassy or Consulate. Under INA 212(a)(9)(B)(i), a departure from the U.S. triggers a 3-year bar to re-entry if they accrued unlawful presence of more than 180 days to less than 1 year, prior to being placed in removal proceedings. The bar to re-entry is 10 years if the unlawful presence lasted for 1 year or more, regardless of whether removal proceedings occurred.

To receive an Immigrant Visa before the 3/10-year bar expires, they must apply for and obtain a Form I-601 or I-601A provisional waiver from USCIS. To get this waiver of inadmissibility, they must prove they have a U.S. citizen or permanent resident spouse, fiance or parent who will face “extreme hardship” if they are denied the visa and entry to the U.S.

If they were not lawfully admitted to the U.S., spouses and stepchildren of U.S. citizens may choose to stay in the U.S., without status, to avoid triggering the 3/10-year bar. But if they later receive Parole in Place, they will meet one major requirement for I-485 adjustment of status.

Parole in Place Offers Limited Benefits

Parole in Place does not permit the applicant to bypass the normal route to becoming a permanent resident. For example, you still need an approved I-130 petition filed by your U.S. citizen spouse to get a marriage-based green card. If you have an INA 204(c) bar prohibiting the approval of the petition, Parole in Place does nothing to make you eligible for the green card.

Furthermore, if you have an inadmissibility bar, such as INA 212(a)(6)(C)(i) (fraud or willful misrepresentation of material facts to obtain U.S. immigration benefits) or INA 212(a)(2)(A) (certain criminal offenses), Parole in Place does not spare you from obtaining a Form I-601 waiver of inadmissibility to get a green card. You also bear the risk of being detained and removed from the United States if you have an unexecuted removal order and have remained unlawfully in the U.S. after being ordered to depart the country.

What to Submit in Parole in Place (Form I-131F) Application

Eligible applicants who are spouses and stepchildren of U.S. citizens must provide:

Proof of identity

  • Valid State or country driver’s license or identification;
  • Birth certificate with photo identification;
  • Valid passport; or
  • Any U.S. government issued document bearing your name, date of birth, and photo

Proof of your (or your parent’s) legally valid marriage on or before June 17, 2024

  • Current marriage certificate showing a legally valid marriage occurred or before June 17, 2024; and
  • Divorce or annulment decree, or death certificate showing that any prior marriages were terminated (if applicable).

Proof of spouse’s (or stepparent’s) status as a U.S. citizen

  • U.S. birth certificate;
  • Certificate of Naturalization;
  • Certificate of Citizenship;
  • Form FS-240, Consular Report of Birth Abroad; or
  • The biographical page of current U.S. passport.

Proof of continuous physical presence in the United States during the required time period (since at least June 17, 2014, through the date of filing, if requesting parole in place as the spouse of a U.S. citizen, or from June 17, 2024, through the date of filing, if requesting parole in place as the stepchild of a U.S. citizen)

  • Internal Revenue Service tax transcripts listing tax information;
  • Rent receipts or utility bills;
  • Deeds, mortgage statements, or rental contracts;
  • Bank, credit card, or loan statements showing regular transactions;
  • Insurance policies;
  • Automobile license receipts, title, or registration;
  • Hospital or medical records;
  • School records (letters, report cards, etc.);
  • Attestations to your physical presence by religious entities, unions, or other civic or community organizations;
  • Official records from a religious entity confirming your participation in a religious ceremony;
  • Birth certificates for children born in the United States;
  • Money order receipts for money sent into or out of the United States; or
  • Any other document that shows that you maintained your physical presence in the United States.

Proof of your qualifying relationship to your U.S. citizen stepparent (for stepchildren only)

  • Your birth certificate listing the name of your noncitizen parent; and
  • Marriage certificate of your noncitizen parent and U.S. citizen stepparent, showing a legally valid marriage took place on or before June 17, 2024, and before your 18th birthday.

Proof showing you merit a favorable exercise of discretion for parole based on a significant public benefit or urgent humanitarian reasons

Any documents relating to:

  • Community ties;
  • Your particular vulnerability related to advanced or young age;
  • Length of presence in the United States;
  • Existence of a mental or physical condition or illness requiring care or treatment in the United States;
  • Your status as a parent or caregiver of a U.S. citizen child, or elderly parent or in-law;
  • Your status as a caregiver for an individual with disabilities, including a U.S. citizen parent, in-law, or sibling;
  • Your status as a victim or witness of a crime or civil rights violation, or labor rights violation under investigation by a labor agency;
  • Effect on other family members, including family members who are U.S. citizens and lawful permanent residents;
  • Any mitigating factors that relate to the specific criminal conduct or prior removal order at issue; or
  • Other positive factors about which you wish to provide information.

USCIS will weigh the positive and negative factors and decide on Form I-131F applications on a discretionary, case-by-case basis.

Get Proper Legal Advice 

Not all undocumented immigrants qualify for Parole in Place. In addition, there may be risks to applying for any U.S. immigration benefits, especially if you have a prior removal (deportation) order, inadmissibility bar, or criminal record.

The Parole in Plan program is vulnerable to being terminated by federal court order. On June 28, in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, the U.S. Supreme Court struck down the Chevron doctrine.  It found that courts may apply their own interpretation of unclear statutes and do not have to defer to federal agencies’ regulations interpreting ambiguous laws.

Although statutory law under INA 212(d)(5) (8 U.S.C. 1182(d)(5) allows parole authority to be exercised, this is only on a case-by-case basis, for urgent humanitarian reasons or a significant public benefit, and for a temporary purpose. Whether the Parole in Place program meets this requirement may be questioned in federal court lawsuits.

Consult an experienced U.S. immigration attorney to discuss whether you qualify for Parole in Place and the pros and cons of filing for this relief.

For more information, see Parole in Place Plan Will Allow Certain Undocumented Spouses and Children of U.S. Citizens to Get Green Cards Through I-485 Adjustment, Instead of Consular Processing.

# # #
The Legal Immigrant provides general information only from Dyan Williams Law. It is based on U.S. immigration laws, regulations and policies that are subject to change. Do not consider it as legal advice. The sharing or receipt of this information does not create an attorney-client relationship.

SUBSCRIBE           CONTACT