Category Archives: green card

A Key Requirement for I-485 Adjustment to Permanent Resident Status: Inspection and Admission OR Inspection and Parole

When you are the beneficiary of an immigrant petition (Form I-130 or Form I-140) and you are already in the United States, you might be eligible to file for a green card without departing for consular processing of the Immigrant Visa.

Statutory law under INA 245(a) (8 U.S.C. §1255) allows a nonimmigrant (e.g. F-1 student or H-1B temporary worker) to adjust to permanent residence based on an approved immigrant petition. This involves filing the Form I-485, Application to Register Permanent Residence or Adjust Status, with USCIS, either concurrently with or after the Form I-130 or Form I-140 filing.

An approved or approvable Form I-130 (family-based) or Form I-140 (employment-based) petition does not necessarily mean you qualify for adjustment of status. There are several eligibility requirements to meet for INA 245(a) adjustment.

Except for INA 245(i) and VAWA-based applicants, one key requirement is that you must have been “inspected and admitted or paroled” into the United States. This applies to even “Immediate Relatives” of a U.S. citizen; namely, spouses, unmarried children under 21 years old, and parents (if the U.S. citizen is 21 years of age or older).

What is the Difference Between “Admission” and “Parole”?

In 1960, Congress amended INA 245(a) to permit otherwise eligible applicants who have been “inspected and admitted or paroled” into the United States to apply for adjustment of status. Courts, legacy Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS), and USCIS have read the statutory language, “inspected and admitted or paroled,” to mean:

  • Inspected and admitted into the United States; OR
  • Inspected and paroled into the United States.

An “admission” means you appeared before a U.S. immigration officer at a U.S. port of entry for inspection, and you were formally admitted to the United States.

Meanwhile, “parole” is a temporary and discretionary relief provided on a case-by-case basis. Parole is when the U.S. immigration officer allows you enter the U.S. without completing the formal admission process, but only after inspection and some vetting are performed.

Main Types of “Admission” for INA 245(a) Adjustment of Status

Admission Stamp in Passport from an Inspection Officer

The most straightforward way to obtain lawful entry to the U.S. is to present your valid passport and U.S. visa at a U.S port of entry to complete the inspection and admission process. An example is when you arrive from overseas at an international airport in the U.S., show your valid F-1 visa in your passport to the U.S. customs officer, answer questions about your intended studies, successfully complete the inspection process, and are allowed into the U.S. with an F-1/duration of status (D/S) admission stamp in your passport.

“Waved-Through” by an Inspection Officer

Applicants may be admitted to the United States if they are “waved through” at a land port of entry. In Matter of Areguillin, the Board of Immigration Appeals found that a person is “admitted” to the U.S. if he physically presents himself for inspection, makes no false claim to U.S. citizenship, and is allowed to enter the U.S., even if the officer does not ask any questions and does not check his travel documents. Verbal communication or physical gestures from the officer allowing the applicant to enter the U.S. is enough.

To satisfy the inspection and admission requirement for INA 245(a) adjustment, however, applicant must prove that they were indeed waved through at a U.S. port of entry. Third-party affidavits from persons with direct knowledge of the facts and corroborating, objective documents are normally required. The USCIS officer adjudicating the Form I-485 must also determine the claim is credible. In addition, if the applicant was traveling with U.S. citizens in a car with U.S. license plates, he will be expected to prove that he was admitted as a noncitizen and was not presumed to be a U.S. citizen.

Fraud or Willful Misrepresentation of Material Facts to Obtain Admission to the U.S.

Admission to the U.S. may be gained by fraud or willful misrepresentation of material facts. An example is the use of a fake passport or a passport belonging to someone else, but advances in technology has made it easier for U.S. customs officer to detect this type of fraud. Another example is when a person obtains a valid visa by lying on the visa application at the U.S. Consulate.

In any event, the Board of Immigration Appeals and most courts have found that a person who is inspected and allowed to enter the U.S. is “admitted,” even if the admission was obtained by fraud or misrepresentation.

INA 212(a)(6)(C)(i) states a person is permanently inadmissible to the U.S. if he used fraud or willful misrepresentation of material facts to obtain U.S. immigration benefits, such as admission at the port of entry. Thus, even if the applicant meets the “inspection and admission” requirement for INA 245(a) adjustment, he would still be denied a green card unless he qualified for, filed for, and obtained the Form I-601 “fraud waiver” under INA 212(i).

Main Types of “Parole” for INA 245(a) Adjustment of Status

Paroled for Deferred Inspection

U.S. Customs & Border Protection (CBP) may grant deferred inspection to “arriving aliens” who are found inadmissible on primary inspection, but who would likely overcome the inadmissibility finding with additional evidence or a waiver.

In such cases, CBP may allow you to enter the U.S. after verifying your identity and concluding you pose no national security risk. With deferred inspection, you are paroled into the United States and must return to CBP to provide additional documents to complete the inspection at a later, specified time.

Urgent Humanitarian Reasons or Significant Public Benefit

Through the filing of a Form I-131, Application for Travel Document, with USCIS, an eligible applicant may be granted parole based on urgent humanitarian reasons or significant public benefit. Special parole programs have included:

Military Parole in Place

In rare cases, USCIS may grant parole to applicants who are already in the United States, but who have yet to be inspected and admitted or inspected and paroled into the country.

In 2010, USCIS announced the creation of the Military Parole in Place policy. It issued a November 2013 Policy Memorandum and a November 2016 Policy Memorandum to clarify or expand the eligibility requirements.

Parole in place is made available on a case-by-case basis, under INA 212(d)(5), to a qualifying spouse, child, or parent of an active duty member or past member of the U.S. armed forces or Selected Reserve. If they do not have a criminal conviction or other serious adverse factors, they are usually granted parole in place to show support for the sacrifices made by U.S. service members, veterans, enlistees, and their families.

Proposed Plan: Parole in Place for Undocumented Spouses and Children of U.S. Citizens

On June 18, 2024, the Biden Administration announced a “Parole in Place” plan to allow certain undocumented spouses and children of U.S. citizens to apply for permanent residence within the U.S., instead of needing to depart for Immigrant Visa processing. The Fact Sheet: President Biden Announces New Actions to Keep Families Together provides basic information on the program, which the Administration says will promote family unity.

Find more details at: Parole in Place Plan Will Allow Certain Undocumented Spouses and Children of U.S. Citizens to Get Green Cards Through I-485 Adjustment, Instead of Consular Processing.

***

For more information on the Form I-485, Adjustment to Permanent Resident process, read:

Who is Eligible (and Not Eligible) for Adjustment to Permanent Resident Status?

Adjusting to Permanent Resident Status Under INA 245(a): Bars, Exceptions and Exemptions

If you are not eligible for I-485 adjustment, you might still be able to obtain the green card through Immigrant Visa processing at the U.S. Consulate or U.S. Embassy abroad. But U.S. immigration violations or criminal records can make you inadmissible and disqualify you from obtaining permanent residence on INA 212 grounds.

When you are inadmissible under section 212, you will not get the green card through I-485 adjustment or Immigrant Visa processing, unless you qualify for a limited exception or unless a waiver of inadmissibility is available, you qualify for it, and it is granted to you. Inadmissibility grounds include health concerns (communicable disease of public health significance), criminal activity, national security, public chargefraud and misrepresentation of material facts to gain immigration benefitsunlawful presence, and prior removals.

Before you apply for permanent residence, be sure to consult a qualified U.S. immigration attorney for legal advice in your specific case.

# # #

This article provides general information only. It is based on law, regulations and policy that are subject to change. Do not consider it as legal advice for any individual case or situation. Each legal case is different and case examples do not constitute a prediction or guarantee of success or failure in any other case. The sharing or receipt of this information does not create an attorney-client relationship.

SUBSCRIBE           CONTACT

I-601 Waiver + Immigrant Visa = A True Success Story

Five years after being found inadmissible under INA 212(a)(6)(C)(i), our client finally received her Immigrant Visa to join her U.S. citizen spouse in the United States. Consistent with normal processing time, USCIS took 10 months to approve her Form I-601 application for waiver of inadmissibility, which we prepared and filed on her behalf.

But due to the U.S. Consulate’s administrative delays and a Presidential Proclamation suspending entries from the client’s home country, it took almost three more years for her to get the visa.

In episode 13 of The Legal Immigrant, you will learn:

1) The U.S. immigration problem when you have a permanent bar under INA 212(a)(6)(C)(i), i.e., fraud or willful misrepresentation of material fact to obtain a U.S. immigration benefit. 

2) The two main solutions to receive an Immigrant Visa or green card (permanent residence) when you have a section 212(a)(6)(C)(i) inadmissibility bar:

a) A motion to reconsider requires you to have a factual basis, legal ground, and procedural means to get the bar removed.

b) Form I-601 waiver application under INA 212(i) requires you to have a “qualifying relative” who will face “extreme hardship” if you do not immigrate to the United States. 

  • A qualifying relative is the U.S. citizen or permanent resident spouse or parent of the applicant. 
  • Extreme hardship must result to the qualifying relative if that person stays in the U.S. without the applicant or relocates to another country to be with the applicant. 

3) The type of documentary evidence and legal argument that are required to receive an I-601 waiver.  This includes medical records on any chronic medical conditions the U.S. citizen spouse (or other qualifying relative) suffers, and reports on lack of medical resources in the visa applicant’s home country. 

4) The outcome of a true success story, which included more obstacles and long delays after the I-601 was approved. Due to the U.S. Consulate’s 221(g) administrative processing and a 212(f) Presidential Proclamation suspending entries from certain countries, it took almost three more years for the applicant to get the Immigrant Visa.

The couple remained committed to one another despite their separate residences and long-distance relationship. Our client finally became a permanent resident after she was initially refused the visa under INA 212(a)(6)(C)(i).

This is a true success story at Dyan Williams Law.

To hear more on the I-601 Waiver + Immigrant Visa success story, click HERE for Episode 13 on The Legal Immigrant podcast or find it on Apple Podcasts or Google Podcasts

To watch the YouTube video, click HERE.  

To read the transcript, click HERE

The Legal Immigrant provides general information only from Dyan Williams Law. Do not consider it as legal advice. Each case is different. Even cases that seem similar can have different outcomes. 

Have you been charged with fraud or misrepresentation? If you’re applying for an immigrant visa or permanent residence and have this lifetime bar, you need an I-601 waiver. Otherwise, if the bar was made in error, you might be able to get it removed through a motion to reconsider.

To receive advice on fraud or misrepresentation issues, you may submit an email to info@dyanwilliamslaw.com or online message at www.dyanwilliamslaw.com.

Dyan Williams, Esq. 

Founder & Principal Attorney
Dyan Williams Law PLLC
(612) 225-9900
info@dyanwilliamslaw.com
www.dyanwilliamslaw.com

COVID-19 Vaccination Required for Green Card Applicants, Starting October 1st

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has a new requirement that will affect all green card applicants. Starting October 1, 2021, intended immigrants must receive full doses of the COVID-19 vaccine to immigrate to the U.S. This new requirement affects eligibility for permanent residence on health-related grounds.

COVID-19 has been added as a Class A medical condition that bars a person from the United States.  Class A inadmissibility includes a communicable disease of public health significance per regulations under the Department of Health and Human Services; and a failure to present documentation of having received vaccinations against vaccine-preventable diseases. 

As of October 1st, the COVID-19 vaccine will be among the vaccines required for applicants to obtain lawful permanent residence, either through the I-485 green card application with USCIS or through an Immigrant Visa application at the U.S. Embassy.

Section 212(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Immigration and Nationality Act states applicants for permanent residence must present proof that they are vaccinated against vaccine-preventable diseases, which include mumps, measles, rubella, polio, tetanus and influenza type B and hepatitis B, and receive any other vaccinations against vaccine-preventable diseases recommended by the Advisory Committee for Immunization Practices.

In episode 12 of The Legal Immigrant, you will learn:

1) The ACIP has now recommended COVID-19 vaccination for the age-appropriate, general U.S. population. The CDC says this means the COVID-19 vaccination is now required to immigrate to the U.S.

2) The CDC does not recognize natural immunity. Its instructions state, “Laboratory tests for COVID-19 immunity must not be used for the civil surgeon exam. The applicant is required to receive the vaccine series regardless of evidence of immunity or prior COVID-19 infection.” The CDC asserts, “The duration of immunity due to natural infection is still being investigated and might not protect the applicant throughout the immigration process.” 

3) What is an acceptable COVID-19 vaccination and proof of vaccination

  • Approved COVID-19 vaccines are those authorized for use in the United States or those listed for emergency use by the World Health Organization. 
  • Personal attestation that you have been vaccinated is not enough. 
  • Showing immunity or recovery from a prior COVID-19 infection is not a permissible basis for a vaccination waiver. 

Acceptable evidence of vaccination includes – 

  • An official vaccination record;
  • A medical chart with physician entries pertaining to the vaccination, including dates you received the vaccine, name or manufacturer and lot number; or,
  • Appropriate medical personnel attestation.

4) What is the COVID-19 vaccination requirement

The designated civil surgeon who performs the medical examination and completes the Form I-693, Report of Medical Examination and Vaccination Record, must confirm the applicant received all doses of the COVID-19 vaccine. The I-693 is part of the green card application within the United States.  A similar medical exam process is performed by a panel physician and required for Immigrant Visa applicants abroad. 

5) What are the exemptions to the vaccination requirement

Blanket waiver – 

  • Applicant is not age appropriate, i.e. too young to receive the vaccine
  • Applicant has medical contraindication to the vaccine
  • Applicant does not have access to an approved COVID-19 vaccine, i.e. no COVID-19 vaccine is routinely available in the state where the civil surgeon practices

Individual waiver – 

  • Applicant refuses to take the vaccine on religious or moral conviction grounds
  • USCIS – not the civil surgeon or CDC – decides whether to grant the individual waiver on religious or moral conviction grounds

6) If an applicant refuses one or more doses of a COVID-19 vaccine series and is not eligible for a waiver of this requirement, the civil surgeon will document the vaccine requirements as incomplete.  On health-related grounds, the applicant will be deemed inadmissible for a Class A condition and will be found ineligible for permanent residence. 

7) As of August 12, 2021, USCIS temporarily extended the validity period for Form I-693 from two years to now four years. For decisions on Form I-485 green card applications issued on or before September 30, 2021, USCIS may accept an otherwise valid Form I-693 if:

  • The civil surgeon’s signature is dated no more than 60 days before the applicant filed the I-485; and
  • No more than four years have passed since the date of the civil surgeon’s signature

8) If you have weighed the risks and benefits, and do not want to take the COVID-19 vaccine for U.S. immigration purposes, you will have to get a completed medical exam report before October 1st. Then you must file your I-485 application within 60 days. 

9) Starting October 1, all green card applicants will have to take the vaccine unless they qualify for a waiver or exemption.

This is general information only and is not legal advice. To request a consultation, you may submit an email to info@dyanwilliamslaw.com or online message through our website’s contact form.

Subscribe to The Legal Immigrant podcast at Apple Podcasts or other apps.

To listen, click HERE for Episode 12 on The Legal Immigrant podcast or find it on Apple Podcasts or Google Podcasts.

If you prefer to read, click HERE for transcript of episode 12.

Resources cited:

# # #

The Legal Immigrant podcast and this article provide general information only. It is based on law, regulations and policy that are subject to change. Do not consider it as legal advice for your situation. The sharing or receipt of this information does not create an attorney-client relationship.

SUBSCRIBE           CONTACT

2019 Public Charge Rule Gets Tossed; 1999 Rule is Back

On March 9, 2021 the Public Charge rule under the prior Trump Administration was vacated and removed. USCIS and the U.S. Department of State will apply the old 1999 rule to determine whether a person is likely to become a public charge on the U.S. government.

Under section 212(a)(4) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), a person seeking entry to the U.S. on a visa or applying for permanent residence is inadmissible if, “at the time of application for admission or adjustment of status, is likely at any time to become a public charge.” Applicants will not be granted entry or a green card if they are deemed inadmissible under section 212(a)(4).

Section 212(a)(4) does not define “public charge.” But in 1999, USCIS and DOS guidelines began to define it to mean a person who is or is likely to become “primarily dependent” on the U.S. government for subsistence, as shown by the receipt of “public cash assistance for income maintenance” or “institutionalization for long-term care at government expense.”

2019 Public Charge Rule Implemented Under Prior Trump Administration

The prior Trump Administration introduced the new Final Rule on August 14, 2019. It amended how U.S. immigration agencies applied section 212(a)(4). The 2019 Rule gave USCIS more discretionary power to deny Form I-485 green card requests, and Form I-129 and Form I-539 applications to change status or extend status, on the public charge ground. The rule was set to take effect on October 15, 2019, i.e. 60 days after its publication. But federal court litigation delayed the implementation of the rule to February 24, 2020.

For some time, USCIS was applying the 2019 Public Charge rule and requiring green card applicants to submit a Form I-944, Declaration of Self-Sufficiency, with financial documentation, such as a credit score report, proof of health insurance, proof of assets and resources and proof of liabilities and debts.  

Episode 9 of The Legal Immigrant podcast summarizes the beginning and end of the 2019 Public Charge Rule:

(1) Federal court challenges to implementation of the 2019 Public Charge Rule

On November 2, 2020, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois vacated the 2019 Public Charge rule nationwide. That decision was stayed by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. On March 9, 2021, the Seventh Circuit lifted its stay and the U.S. District Court vacating the 2019 Public Charge Rule went into effect.

As a result, USCIS immediately stopped applying the Public Charge Final Rule to all pending applications and petitions that would have been subject to that rule. USCIS agreed to apply the 1999 Interim Field Guidance, which was in place before the Public Charge Final Rule was implemented, when adjudicating any green card applications or application for change/extension of status that was pending or received on or after March 9, 2021. 

(2) The 3 key changes under the 2019 Public Charge Rule 

(a) Expanded the definition of “public benefits”  to include previously excluded programs, such as Federally funded Medicaid with certain exclusion; Supplemental Nutrition and Assistance Program (SNAP), formerly called food stamps; Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Program; Section 8 Project-Based Rental Assistance; and Public Housing under section 9 the Housing Act of 1937, 42 U.S.C. 1437 et seq.

(b) Deemed applicants to be a public charge if they received one or more public benefits for more than 12 months in the aggregate within any 36-month period. 

(c) Applied the totality of the circumstances test based on age, health, family status, assets, resources, financial status, education, and skills.  One heavily weighted negative factor was having received or been approved to receive one or more public benefits for more than 12 months in total within the 36-month period prior to applying for admission to the U.S., a green card, or a status change or extension.

The shift toward the weighing of positive factors and negative factors meant the Form I-864, Affidavit of Support, was no longer relied on as sufficient proof – by itself – to demonstrate the applicant would not become a public charge in immigration cases that require the Affidavit of Support.

(3) The decision to stop applying the Rule under the current Biden Administration

A federal case challenging the 2019 Public Charge rule was dismissed by the U.S. Supreme Court upon the Biden Administration’s request. The new Administration has already stated it will not continue to apply the 2019 rule and will return to the 1999 rule. 

Because the Biden Administration has decided to not defend the rule, the Department of Justice will no longer pursue appellate review of judicial decisions invalidating or stopping enforcement of the 2019 public charge rule. There is no more need for advocacy groups to continue with this challenge in court. 

(4) How the decision to return to the 1999 Rule affects applications and petitions

On or after March 9, 2021, applicants and petitioners should not provide information required solely by the 2019 Public Charge Final Rule. 

For example, applicants for adjustment to permanent residence should not provide the Form I-944, Declaration of Self-Sufficiency, or any evidence or documentation required on that form with their Form I-485. Applicants and petitioners for extension of nonimmigrant stay and change of nonimmigrant status should not provide information related to the receipt of public benefits on Form I-129 (Part 6), Form I-129CW (Part 6), Form I-539 (Part 5), and Form I-539A (Part 3).

(5) What is still required to meet the INA 212(4)(a) requirements

Even though the 2019 Public Charge Rule has been tossed, statutory law regarding public charge inadmissibility is still in effect. It applies to:

(a) Applicants for immigrant visas and green cards (unless Congress has exempted them from this ground). Congress has carved out certain exemptions to the public charge ground of inadmissibility as follows:

  • Refugees;
  • Asylees;
  • Certain T and U nonimmigrant visa applicants (human trafficking and certain crime victims, respectively); and
  • Certain self-petitioners under the Violence Against Women Act.

(b)  Applicants for extension of nonimmigrant stay or change of nonimmigrant status (such applicants are subject to the rule’s public benefit condition unless the nonimmigrant classification is exempted by law or regulation from the public charge ground of inadmissibility). As of March 9, USCIS will no longer apply the separate, but related, “public benefits condition” to applications or petitions for extension of nonimmigrant stay and change of nonimmigrant status, e.g. Form I-129 or Form I-539. 

While the 2019 Public Charge Final Rule no longer applies to pending applications and petitions as of March 9, applicants still have to show they will not become a public charge to the U.S., based on 1999 guidelines. 

Family-based green card or immigrant visa applicants must still submit the Form I-864, Affidavit of Support, from the petitioner (sponsor) and joint sponsor. Petitioners are still required to submit financial documents to demonstrate they meet the income requirement to sponsor their relative in the United States.

For more information, see:

# # #

The Legal Immigrant podcast and this article provide general information only. It is based on law, regulations and policy that are subject to change. Do not consider it as legal advice for your situation. The sharing or receipt of this information does not create an attorney-client relationship.

SUBSCRIBE           CONTACT

Dyan Williams, Esq.
info@dyanwilliamslaw.com
www.dyanwilliamslaw.com

Immigration Reform Update: Earned Path to Citizenship and Repeals of Certain Inadmissibility Bars

On February 18, the U.S. Citizenship Act of 2021 was introduced in the House by California Congresswoman Linda Sánchez and in the Senate by New Jersey Senator Robert Menendez. The White House first announced the bill on January 20, which was the first day of the Biden Administration.

The bill is 353 pages long. It contains sweeping provisions that, if passed, will overhaul many parts of the U.S. immigration system.

It seeks to give certain undocumented immigrants Lawful Prospective Immigrant (LPI) status and an 8-year path to U.S. citizenship; allow eligible DREAMERS, TPS holders and farmworkers to immediately apply for permanent residence; repeal the 3/10 year unlawful presence bar under INA 212(a)(9)(B) and the permanent bar under INA 212(a)(9)(C); and create an exception to the misrepresentation of citizenship bar for any person who was under age 21 when the false claim was made.

In Episode 8 of The Legal Immigrant podcast, I focus on the following provisions in the reform bill:

1. Section 1101, Adjustment of Status of Eligible Entrants to that of Lawful Prospective Immigrant (LPI), and Section 1102, Adjustment of Status of Lawful Prospective Immigrants

  • Provides earned 8-year path to citizenship for certain undocumented immigrants who have been present in the U.S. on or before January 1, 2021, and certain persons who were removed from the U.S. on or after January 20, 2017, but were inside the U.S. for at least 3 years prior

2. Section 3104, Promoting Family Unity

  • Repeals the 3/10 year bar under INA 212(a)(9)(B) due to accrual of more than 180 days of unlawful presence in the U.S. prior to departure
  • Eliminates the permanent bar under INA 212(a)(9)(C) due to illegal re-entry following more than 1 year of unlawful presence or following a removal order 
  • Creates exception to the false claim to U.S. citizenship bar under INA 212(a)(6)(C)(ii) for persons who made the misrepresentation when they were under age 21

Key points to consider: 

1.  The Immigration Reform bill is bicameral (introduced in the House and Senate on February 18), but is not bipartisan (sponsored by Democrats only and no Republicans). 

The comprehensive nature of the bill and the big changes proposed will make it harder to get the necessary votes. Moderation could be needed especially when Democrats have a slight margin in the House and a 50-50 split in the Senate. Vice President Harris has the tie-breaking vote.  But a supermajority of 60 senators is normally needed to pass major legislation in the Senate.

To move forward, the full legislation might have to be split up into separate smaller bills, or get added to the budget reconciliation process. Some Republicans have voiced opposition to the Biden Administration’s approach to immigration reform. 

2.   Even if the law is passed and signed by the President, it may take up to a year for the new rules to be drafted.  And it will take some time for the new application processes and forms to be rolled out and implemented. The applicant will also have to gather documents, including evidence of identity, proof of physical presence in the U.S. for the period that is required by law, and supporting records for any waiver of inadmissibility that is needed. 

3.     If you already qualify for another way to immigrate to the United States, such as by employment-based immigration or by a legal, bona fide marriage to a U.S. citizen, it’s better to use the existing path instead of wait for the results of this reform bill. 

4.     You must not deliberately fall out of status or illegally re-enter the U.S in the hope that you will be eligible for LPI status or other immigration benefits that have yet to be passed into law. Unlawful presence and illegal re-entries to the U.S. continue to have serious immigration consequences unless the law is amended to get rid of them.

Resources cited: 

For more information on inadmissibility waivers, see:

Consent to Reapply for Admission – I-212 Waiver: Remedy to Overcoming INA 212(a)(9)(A) and (C) Bars

When do you need an I-212 Waiver (and how do you get it)?

What should you do to get your I-212 Waiver?

When do you need an I-601 Waiver due to immigration fraud or misrepresentation (and how do you get it)?

When do you need an I-601 waiver due to unlawful presence (and how do you get it)?

212(d)(3)(A) Nonimmigrant Waiver: Advantages and Disadvantages

# # #

The Legal Immigrant podcast and this article provide general information only. It is based on law, regulations and policy that are subject to change. Do not consider it as legal advice for your situation. The sharing or receipt of this information does not create an attorney-client relationship.

SUBSCRIBE           CONTACT